横浜国立大学オープンアクセス方針実施要領、横浜国立大学学術情報リポジトリ運営指針を一部改正しました(2020.8.6)

メンテナンスに関するお知らせ, ・登録許諾書,オープンアクセス方針適用例外申請書の様式を一部変更しました(2020.1.24)→様式ダウンロードは こちら から.

ir-admin[at]ynu.ac.jp ([at]を@に置き換えて下さい)

  • 横浜国立大学教育学部紀要.I, 教育科学
  • 横浜国立大学教育学部紀要.II, 人文科学
  • 横浜国立大学教育学部紀要.III, 社会科学
  • 横浜国立大学教育学部紀要.IV, 自然科学
  • 横浜国立大学教育学会 研究論集(2014-)
  • 横浜国立大学教育相談・支援総合センター研究論集
  • 横浜国立大学機器分析評価センター年報
  • ときわの杜論叢(2014-)
  • 横浜国大国語研究(1983-)
  • スラヴィアーナ = Slaviana(2009-)
  • ロシア思想史研究(2004-)
  • 横浜国大国語教育研究(-2021)
  • 横浜国立大学教育紀要(1962-1997)
  • 横浜国立大学人文紀要. 第一類, 哲学・社会科学(1952-1997)
  • 横浜国立大学人文紀要. 第二類, 語学・文学(1952-1997)
  • 横浜国立大学理科紀要. 第一類, 数学・物理学(1952-1954)
  • 横浜国立大学理科紀要. 第一類, 数学・物理学・化学(1955-1957)
  • 横浜国立大学理科紀要. 第一類, 数学・物理学(1958)
  • 横浜国立大学理科紀要. 第一類, 数学・物理学・化学(1961-1987)
  • 横浜国立大学理科紀要. 第一類, 数学・物理・化学(1988-1997)
  • 横浜国立大学理科紀要. 第二類, 生物学・地学(1952-1996)
  • 横浜国立大学教育学部理科教育実習施設研究報告(1983-1997)
  • 横浜国立大学教育人間科学部理科教育実習施設研究報告(1998)
  • Actinia : bulletin of the Manazuru Marine Laboratory for Science Education(1999-2001)
  • 横浜国際経済法学(1993-2013)
  • 横浜国立大学環境科学研究センター紀要(1974-2001)
  • 横浜国立大学留学生センター紀要(1994-2005)
  • 横浜国立大学留学生センター教育研究論集
  • 横浜国立大学機器分析センター年報(1995-2003)
  • 横浜国立大学大学教育総合センター紀要
  • The journal of the Yokohama Municipal University. Series D(1953-1961)
  • Yokohama Mathematical Journal(1962-)

Home

EDITORIAL BOARD

CERTIFICATE

literature review on kaizen

Author Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

literature review on kaizen

Subject Area

Why Us? >>

Kaizen techniques: a literature review

Today is the world of tough competition; any industries in the world are under a constant dilemma to reduce cost and improve quality. To overcome this dilemma and confusion, company are required to follow some modern techniques like Active Base Costing, Target Costing, life cycle costing, Kaizen costing and many other available techniques. But most popular among this are Kaizen costing. By using the kaizen techniques company can increase their production and improved overall efficiency of the company. This paper discussed on different literature that have been published in the field of Kaizen techniques and present a Review of literature. This review of literature will help to the new researched for their further studies.

PDF icon

CALL FOR PAPERS

Online paypal payment, ijmce recommendation.

literature review on kaizen

Monthly archive

Advantages of IJCR

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20% . So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

literature review on kaizen

Select language

Copyright information

Copyright Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency (VADEA) Jul 2/Jul 3, 2020

Access to the complete full text

This is a short preview of the document. Your library or institution may give you access to the complete full text for this document in ProQuest.

KAIZEN COSTING: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (2015-2020)

The Essay Writing Experts UK Essay Experts

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written essay. Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

View full disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

Literature Review On The Kaizen Theory Management Essay

Reference this

INTRODUCTION

Literature review.

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

CONCEPT ANALYSIS

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

BENEFITS TO ORGANIZATIONS

Cite this work.

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Related Services

Student working on a laptop

Essay Writing Service

Student reading book

Student reading and using laptop to study

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please:

Our academic writing and marking services can help you!

Related Lectures

Study for free with our range of university lectures!

Academic Knowledge Logo

Freelance Writing Jobs

Looking for a flexible role? Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher?

Study Resources

Free resources to assist you with your university studies!

Search Support Articles

*You can also browse our support articles here >

Change Region / Country

Here you can choose which regional hub you wish to view, providing you with the most relevant information we have for your specific region. If your specific country is not listed, please select the UK version of the site, as this is best suited to international visitors.

United Kingdom

United States

United Arab Emirates

Saudi Arabia

Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement ( Kaizen ): literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation

Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review volume  14 ,  pages 29–59 ( 2017 ) Cite this article

2279 Accesses

27 Citations

Metrics details

Continuous improvement ( Kaizen ) has been identified as a crucial factor for strengthening firms’ competitiveness in the automotive industry as well as others, and many scholars view it as detailed below. In the existing literature, from a perspective of innovation, Kaizen has often been conceived of as an accumulation of similarly small, mutually independent, incremental process innovations that are conducted by workers, work-teams, and their leaders. However, few empirical case studies examine the relevance of this conventional notion of Kaizen . Do Kaizen activities contribute only to similarly small, incremental process innovations? Does Kaizen only consist of various mutually independent innovations? Is Kaizen always achieved by workers and work-teams rather than by engineers? This paper attempts to observe those continuous improvements conducted in a certain factory for a certain period. Through longitudinal observations, this paper shows via seven case studies that (1) Kaizen consists of a series of innovations with various scales and that these scales could also be estimated by the “scope of coordination” in addition to existing scale indicators, such as the investment amount, and outcomes, such as the cost reduction effect. Additionally, (2) Kaizen sometimes induces small changes in product design and affects organizational activities of production design as a small-scale product innovation. Furthermore, (3) Kaizen activities sometimes influence other Kaizen activities. With regard to these characteristics of Kaizen , this paper implies that (4) Kaizen management needs organizational design. For example, in Toyota’s case, not only work-teams but also product/process design engineers contribute to Kaizen , and shop-floor engineers play a vital role in coordinating between shop-floors and engineering departments on the basis of the “staff-in-line structure” of organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution .

Access options

Buy single article.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Rent this article via DeepDyve.

This article uses the word “ Kaizen ” as an uncountable noun.

Boer and Gertsen ( 2003 ) define continuous innovation as process and product innovation, but they also think of continuous innovations as relatively small and numerous changes.

Koujô-Gijyutsu-In in Japanese.

Evolutionary economics considers that changes of organizational routines occur by chance like distribution of a random variable (Nelson and Winter 1982 ), thus making micro-firm-level analysis difficult.

Their discussion considers it important to divide one routine into two aspects (ostensive and performative). The ostensive aspect describes standard rules or procedures that govern behavior in organizations. The performative aspect indicates the specific and inherently improvisational actions taken by people in organizations. This study does not use this idea.

Womack et al. ( 1990 ) also studies Takaoka.

Following D'Adderio ( 2011 ), an organizational routine change was deemed to have occurred when an explicit operational procedure was altered.

For example, operational improvement, process/production engineering, product/design engineering, etc. could be included in Kaizen projects as innovations.

This is calculated as 12 times 0.5 = 6.

¥100 yen was approximately US$1 in 2015.

It is a kind of Japanese English used in factories. Takt time means the time necessary to assemble one unit.

It is a hinged cover over the engine.

It is also called the “side member”.

Of course, it is a required consideration that weighted scope of coordination is one kind of investment.

From these cases, we can say that Kaizen consists of a variable scale of innovations and we can measure this by the scope of coordination in addition to the investment amount and cost reduction effects.

Of course, it is doubtful that Toyota almost always determines the exact extent of coordination necessary for Kaizen .

The term “line” here means both organizational positions: line and production line.

Mintzberg ( 1980 ) calls an organization resembling staff-in-line “the Divisionalized Form organization” (p. 335). However, staff-in-line is nearer the plant floor than in Mintzberg’s model and is unique in serving two roles.

Interview conducted on February 13, 2014.

The scale of innovations (and variability thereof) is also a function of the scope of innovations because innovative activities in this context are organizational in nature and require coordination.

Abernathy WJ (1978) The productivity dilemma: roadblock to innovation in the automobile industry. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

Google Scholar  

Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 64(7):228–254

Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ Sci 10(1):43–68

Article   Google Scholar  

Anand G, Ward PT, Tatikonda MV, Schilling DA (2009) Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. J Oper Manag 27(6):444–461

Barnard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Boston

Barratt M, Choi TY, Li M (2011) Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends research outcomes and future research implications. J Oper Manag 29(4):329–342

Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Ind Corp Change 13(4):643–678

Becker MC (2005) The concept of routines: some clarifications. Camb J Econ 29(2):249–262

Bessant J, Caffyn S (1997) High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. Int J Technol Manag 14(1):7–28

Bessant J, Caffyn S, Gallagher M (2001) An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behavior. Technovation 21(2):67–77

Bhuiyan N, Baghel A (2005) An overview of continuous improvement: from the past to the present. Manag Decis 43(5):761–771

Boer H, Gertsen F (2003) From continuous improvement to continuous innovation: a (retro)(per)spective. Int J Technol Manag 26(8):805–827

Choi TY (1995) Conceptualizing continuous improvement: implications for organizational change. Omega 23(6):607–624

Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product development performance: strategy organization and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business Press, Boston

D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res Policy 37(5):769–789

D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory. J Inst Econ 7(2):123–197

Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–679

Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

Ettlie JE, Reza EM (1992) Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad Manag J 35(4):795–827

Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ Sci 11(6):611–629

Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin Sci Quart 48(1):94–118

Fujimoto T (1999) The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. Oxford University Press, New York

Fujimoto T (2007) Competing to be really good: The behind-the-scenes drama of capability-building competition in the automobile industry. International House of Japan, Tokyo

Fujimoto T (2014) The long tail of the auto industry life cycle. J Prod Innov Manag 31(1):8–16

Gulick L, Urwick L (eds) (1937) Papers on the science of administration. Institute of Public Administration, New York

Hackman JR, Wageman R (1995) Total quality management: empirical conceptual and practical issues. Admin Sci Quart 40(2):309–342

Hayes RH, Clark KB (1985) Explaining observed productivity differentials between plants: implications for operations research. Interfaces 15(6):3–14

Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC (1979) Link manufacturing process and product life cycles Harvard. Bus Rev 57(1):133–140

Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (N) ever-changing world. Strateg Manag J 32(11):1243–1250

Imai M (1986) Kaizen : the key to Japan’s competitive success. Random House Business Division, New York

Iwao S (2015) Organizational routine and coordinated imitation. Ann Bus Admin Sci 14(5):279–291

Koike K (1998) NUMMI and its prototype plant in Japan: a comparative study of human resource development at the workshop level. J Jpn Int Econ 12(1):49–74

Koike K, Tyuma H, Ōta S (2001) Monozukuri no ginou (the skills for manufacturing). Toyokeizai, Tokyo (in Japanese)

Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin Sci Quart 12(1):1–47

Lindberg P, Berger A (1997) Continuous improvement: design organization and management. Int J Technol Manag 14(1):86–101

March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Blackwell, Cambridge

Mintzberg H (1980) Structure in 5′s: a synthesis of the research on organization design. Manag Sci 26(3):322–341

Monden Y (1983) Toyota production system: practical approach to production management. Engineering & Management Press (Productivity Press), New York

Myers S, Marquis DG (1969) Successful industrial innovations (NSF 69-17). National Science Foundation, Washington

Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Ōno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, New York

Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts while hoping for patterns of action. Inform Organ 18(4):235–250

Plowman DA, Baker LT, Beck TE, Kulkarni M, Solansky ST, Travis DV (2007) Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change. Acad Manag J 50(3):515–543

Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits capital credit interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Shingo S (1981) A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint. Japan Management Association, Tokyo

Shingo S (1988) Non-stock production: the Shingo system for continuous improvement. Productivity Press, Cambridge

Simon HA (1947) 1997) Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York

Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

Thompson VA (1965) Bureaucracy and innovation. Admin Sci Quart 10(1):1–20

Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Ann Rev Psychol 50(1):361–386

Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24(10):991–995

Womack JP, Jones T, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New York

Yin Robert K (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage, New York

Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Shumpei Iwao

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shumpei Iwao .

About this article

Cite this article.

Iwao, S. Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement ( Kaizen ): literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 14 , 29–59 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-017-0067-4

Download citation

Published : 01 February 2017

Issue Date : June 2017

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-017-0067-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

JEL Classification

Advertisement

Browse Econ Literature

More features

RePEc Biblio

Author registration.

IDEAS home

Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen): literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation

Corrections

(University of Tokyo)

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher, references listed on ideas.

Follow serials, authors, keywords & more

New papers by email

Subscribe to new additions to RePEc

Public profiles for Economics researchers

Various research rankings in Economics

RePEc Genealogy

Who was a student of whom, using RePEc

Curated articles & papers on economics topics

Upload your paper to be listed on RePEc and IDEAS

EconAcademics

Blog aggregator for economics research

Cases of plagiarism in Economics

Job market papers

RePEc working paper series dedicated to the job market

Fantasy league

Pretend you are at the helm of an economics department

Services from the StL Fed

Data, research, apps & more from the St. Louis Fed

About RePEc

Initiative for open bibliographies in Economics

News about RePEc

Questions about IDEAS and RePEc

RePEc volunteers

Participating archives

Publishers indexing in RePEc

Privacy statement

Legal statement.

Found an error or omission?

Opportunities to help RePEc

Get papers listed

Have your research listed on RePEc

Open a RePEc archive

Have your institution's/publisher's output listed on RePEc

Get RePEc data

Use data assembled by RePEc

IMAGES

  1. Solved: B) Review Of Literature Kaizen Is Powerful Tool Of...

    literature review on kaizen

  2. Kaizen Philosophy, A Review of Literature

    literature review on kaizen

  3. Kaizen Theory Audiobook by Introbooks Team

    literature review on kaizen

  4. Kaizen

    literature review on kaizen

  5. (PDF) Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen): literature review and

    literature review on kaizen

  6. Practising Kaizen in an age of lockdowns and social distancing

    literature review on kaizen

VIDEO

  1. All you can Eat Buffet, KAIZEN BALI, #bali2022 #kaizenbali #buffetrestaurant

  2. What is Literature Review?

  3. ALIEN MAGGIE FUNKO🤩💎 #funko #youtubeshorts #shorts #funkopop #unboxing #collectibles #simpsons

  4. Böker Plus Kaizen Review

  5. 200NL Hand Review Using GTOWizard (Part 2)

  6. Kaizen script

COMMENTS

  1. Kaizen Philosophy: A Review of Literature

    Kaizen Philosophy: A Review of Literature. Jagdeep Singh* and Harwinder Singh**. * M. Tech Student, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering

  2. A Literature Review on Kaizen:

    At the beginning of Kaizen study, a lot of researchers from Japan and other countries proposed ... A Literature Review on Kaizen(Huaxing Shang).

  3. Kaizen techniques: a literature review

    But most popular among this are Kaizen costing. By using the kaizen techniques company can increase their production and improved overall efficiency of the

  4. Kaizen- An Essential Tool while adopting Lean Manufacturing

    Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com ... KAIZEN – A case study ... In the literature that mentions kaizen is often.

  5. A Review: Literature Survey for the Implementation of Kaizen

    FIG 1: REVIEW OF LITERATURE RELATED TO KAIZEN CONCEPT. According to Imai (1986), Kaizen is a continuous improvement process involving everyone, managers and.

  6. KAIZEN COSTING: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (2015-2020)

    Kaizen costing focuses on cost reduction based on quality, productivity, and labormanagement relations. Thus, an improvement must be created and implemented

  7. Literature Review On The Kaizen Theory Management Essay

    The introduction of the four concepts behind Kaizen (also known as Continuous Improvement), Benchmarking, TQM and Elimination of Wastes

  8. KAIZEN: An Ancestral Strategy for Operational Improvement

    The second part explains the research methodology. In the third part, the results of the literature review for decades are presented, providing

  9. Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen)

    In the existing literature, from a perspective of innovation, Kaizen has often been conceived of as an accumulation of similarly small, mutually

  10. Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen)

    In the existing literature, from a perspective of innovation, Kaizen has often been conceived of as an accumulation of similarly small, mutually independent